Craft the experience that effectively meets the needs of two distinct user groups

Company
Yuanxin Tech.
Time
3 months
Current State
Launched
Team
Product Designer, Product Manager, Front-end Engineer

Product Brief

􀫕

􀫕

Dr. Mom

📚

Encyclopedia of Essential Oils

Encyclopedia of Essential Oils

📱

Mobile App

Mobile App

Subscription-based

Subscription-based

􀆊

What are essential oils and recipes?

􀆊

What are essential oils and recipes?

􀆊

What are essential oils and recipes?

old Version

􀋭

􀋭

Final outcome

􀋭

􀋭

Business Goal

􁞸

􁞸

Increase the number of subscribers

Design approach

􀛭

􀛭

Optimize the information architecture of current recipe-finding experience to provide detailed and clear information.

Design a straightforward and friendly recipe-finding experience that doesn't require users to have essential oil knowledge.

Imapct

􀐾

􀐾

+34.2%

User Satisfaction

+22.6%

Number of Subscribers

problem Analysis

User groups

􀁞

􀁞

Essential Oil Enthusiast

I'm not into learning about essential oils, but I'm excited to use them for a better life.

Aromatherapist

I know a lot about essential oils, and I use them to help people out.

Use cases

􀁞

􀁞

How’s the current experience of finding recipe?

􀁞

􀁞

Why is the user's psych level continuously declining?

It's because they need to make decisions based on a series of information beyond their knowledge domain, leading to:

🤯

Pain point

Information Overload

Why do aromatherapists still fail to achieve the optimal experience?

🤔

Pain point

Need more and clear information to make decision

Key findings

􁅇

􁅇

The needs of the two user groups differ significantly.

Enthusiast prefer not to have essential oil knowledge during decision-making, while aromatherapists seek additional information to aid their decisions.

How can I craft an experience that meets the needs of two distinct user groups?

Redesign the flow of finding recipe

􀛭

􀛭

Old Flow

Old Flow

Optimize a flow that caters to the needs of two distinct user groups.

Optimize a flow that caters to the needs of two distinct user groups.

New Flow

New Flow

Segment user flows to design experiences suitable for different user groups.

Segment user flows to design experiences suitable for different user groups.

What’s the best page to split flow ?

􀛭

􀛭

Option A

Option A

Health Issue Page

Health Issue Page

Option B

Option B

Homepage

Homepage

  • Aromatherapist can access the feature designed for them easily and intuitively.

  • It has the least impact on the experience of aromatherapists.

Homepage redesign

􀛭

􀛭

Before

After

Design approach

􀛭

􀛭

Optimize the information architecture of current recipe-finding experience to provide detailed and clear information.

Design a straightforward and friendly recipe-finding experience that doesn't require users to have essential oil knowledge.

aromatherapist flow redesign

Problem

􀯧

􀯧

Homepage

Search page

Search result page

Recipe detailed page

Search result page redesign

􀯧

􀯧

Design decision

Add a new page for recipe choosing, so user only need to choose health issue in search result page

recipe detail page redesign

􀯧

􀯧

Problem analysis

This page includes multiple tasks, which overwhelmed and confuse user.

Design decision

Redefine the page structure to separate the tasks clearly.

Before

After

Final design

􀯧

􀯧

Essential Oil Enthusiast flow design

Essential Oil Enthusiast flow design

Challenge

􀎞

􀎞

Enthusiasts lack basic essential oil knowledge to make decisions during the recipe-finding process.

How might we

􀬁

􀬁

How might we guide enthusiast through a aromatherapy consultation-like flow?

How does aromatherapy consultation like?

􀬁

􀬁

I conducted research through various methods, including interviews with experts, watching informative YouTube videos.

Aromatherapy consultation process

􀬁

􀬁

Preparation

Assessment

Plan and Recommendations

Task flow

􀬁

􀬁

which Interaction mode works best for enthusiast ?

􁊿

􁊿

Browsing

PROS:

  • Information at a Glance

  • Self-Paced Exploration

CONS:

  • Not suitable for freshman due to the knowledge gap

Questionnaire-style

PROS:

  • Consistent layout lead to high efficiency

  • Progress bar can reduce user uncertainty

CONS:

  • Questionnaire-style feels like a test, lacks a human touch

Conversational

PROS:

  • Experience with empathy

  • Easy and engaging experience

CONS:

  • User has higher expectation of functionality

  • Low efficiency

A: Questionnaire-style

PROS:

  • Straightforward step-by-step experience.

  • Progress bar can reduce user uncertainty

CONS:

  • Questionnaire-style feels like a test, lacks a human touch

B: Conversational

PROS:

  • Friendly experience

  • Easy and engaging experience

CONS:

  • User has higher expectation of functionality

  • Low efficiency

Browsing

PROS:

  • Information at a Glance

  • Self-Paced Exploration

CONS:

  • Not suitable for freshman due to the knowledge gap

Questionnaire-style

PROS:

  • Consistent layout lead to high efficiency

  • Progress bar can reduce user uncertainty

CONS:

  • Questionnaire-style feels like a test, lacks a human touch

Conversational

PROS:

  • Experience with empathy

  • Easy and engaging experience

CONS:

  • User has higher expectation of functionality

  • Low efficiency

Usability test

􀎞

􀎞

key findings

􀬁

􀬁

Users appreciate the straightforward nature of questionnaire-style interactions. However, they also prefer conversational interactions for the friendly experience they provide

Users appreciate the straightforward nature of questionnaire-style interactions. However, they also prefer conversational interactions for the friendly experience they provide

Users appreciate the straightforward nature of questionnaire-style interactions. However, they also prefer conversational interactions for the friendly experience they provide

Final interation type

􀇺

􀇺

A + B (Questionnaire-style + Conversational)

A + B (Questionnaire-style + Conversational)

Straightforward and friendly experience

Straightforward and friendly experience

lo-Fi Wireframe

􀎞

􀎞

Final outcome

Takeaway

🎁

🎁

Fully understand user needs and designing a coherent task flow are pivotal to the entire product.

Comparing product design to building a house, user needs are the foundation, while the task flow is the framework.